Calkins Contradicts Calkins

“So if competing in the world today is different than it was for Memphis 10 years ago, it’s only because of the philosophy of the head coach.”

Geoff Calkins, 5/1/2017

Harsh words.

But what was Calkins saying about Memphis’ ability to “compete in the world” last year?

“If they are not (successful at obtaining Big 12 admission), Memphis athletics will continue on a slow slide toward irrelevance.”

Geoff Calkins, 5/3/2016

What a difference a year makes, huh?

A year ago, according to Geoff Calkins, Memphis’ place in the college basketball universe depended on things like money, resources, television contracts and conference affiliation.

Today, also according to Calkins, it’s entirely dependent on Tubby Smith’s recruiting philosophy.

Geoff Calkins is a great columnist. I enjoy his work and even own his recently published book.

So it’s with sadness that I’ve been enduring his blistering attacks on Tubby Smith.

It’s not that Tubby Smith doesn’t deserve to be questioned. Obviously, that goes with the territory at Memphis.

I just can’t figure out why Calkins (and Gary Parrish) continue to write hit pieces based on demonstrably false premisses.

Last week, Parrish falsely implied that Tubby Smith inherited a program on the rise.

Um, ok.

Now, Calkins is contradicting his own previous statements by telling us that nothing has changed at Memphis vis a vis their competitive realities.

It boggles the mind.

Again, the latest false attack, from Calkins today:

“So if competing in the world today is different than it was for Memphis 10 years ago, it’s only because of the philosophy of the head coach.”

Only?

Only?

Just so we’re clear about how wrong and unfair this is, let’s consult a dictionary.

According to the fine folks at Google, the wordOnly is an adverb that means “no one or nothing more besides; solely or exclusively. “

So Calkins is claiming that, apart from the philosophy of the head basketball coach, there have been no other impactful (to recruiting) changes at Memphis over the past 10 years?

This is so unfair and so false, it’s almost not worth taking apart.

But let’s do it anyway, with a few assists from Calkins himself.

As an outside observer, it’s clear that perhaps the biggest difference in the Memphis basketball program between 2007 to 2017 is the Athletic Director overseeing it.

Everybody knows that then Memphis Athletic Director R.C. Johnson gave basketball coach John Calipari complete dominion and everything he wanted.

Memphis has the NCAA probation to prove it.

How do I know Calipari had unfettered control?

Because Geoff Calkins told me so.

Here’s Geoff Calkins on May 29, 2009, in the aftermath of NCAA allegations against the UofM:

“The most serious allegation is that former Memphis player Derrick Rose had someone take his SAT for him. What’s the big deal about that? R.C. Johnson had someone else run his whole athletic department.”

Boom.

But how does this differ from the kind of athletic department in which Tubby Smith operates – a department currently run by Athletic Director Tom Bowen?

Again, who better to ask than Geoff Calkins himself?

Here is Calkins’ tweet from January 3, 2013 the day after Bowen publicly contradicted then head basketball coach Josh Pastner on a minor scheduling issue:

“If I’m Josh Pastner, I try to win a tournament game, then take the best job that comes available. Totally gutted by his AD.”

So 10 years ago the Memphis basketball coach gets to run the entire athletic department, and under the current boss the basketball coach should expect to be “gutted” publicly if he has an opinion about the schedule.

Got it.

No difference.

Again, nothing is different, other than the Head Coach’s philosophy.

It’s absurd.

Not to beat a dead horse, but it also bears repeating that over the past 10 years Memphis’ primary geographic rivals (Ole Miss, UT, Arkansas, etc.) have developed an incredible resource advantage.

Surely, this effects recruiting budgets.

Over the past decade, the SEC’s television revenue distribution has gone from $10.2 million in 2007 to $40 million in 2016. Over the same time period Memphis’ television revenue went from a meager $1.1 million per year to a meager $2 million per year.

Desperate to keep up, Memphis tried, and failed, to get into the Big 12.

So what? What does not getting into the Big 12 have to do with basketball recruiting?

Good questions. For the answer let’s again turn to Geoff Calkins.

Here’s he is on May 3, 2016 describing what it would mean if Memphis failed to get into the Big 12.

“If they are not (successful at obtaining Big 12 admission), Memphis athletics will continue on a slow slide toward irrelevance.”

How can you square this May 3rd, 2016 statement with blaming Tubby Smith exclusively for the fact that Memphis’ 2017 recruiting isn’t up to snuff?

You can’t.

Again, I’m a big Calkins fan, but this is getting ridiculous.